Olympic gymnastics legend Simone Biles is facing a tidal wave of backlash — and the cost may be her biggest brand deal yet. New Balance has reportedly cut ties with the decorated athlete after a heated exchange on social media, where Biles publicly criticized former NCAA swimmer and women’s rights advocate Riley Gaines. The fallout? A staggering $22 million endorsement deal now reportedly off the table.
What Sparked the Controversy?

The drama began when Riley Gaines, known for her outspoken views on protecting women’s sports, posted a tweet condemning the inclusion of biological males in female athletic competitions. Simone Biles, a longtime advocate for inclusion and diversity, fired back with a sharp response many are calling a “verbal body slam.”
Biles’ tweet, which read in part, “Real champions rise by lifting others — not by tearing them down for who they are,” quickly went viral. But rather than sparking a wave of applause, the Olympic hero found herself in hot water — accused by many fans and former supporters of “turning her back on biological women.”
New Balance Reacts Swiftly
Within days of the social media spat, rumors began circulating that New Balance, one of Biles’ top sponsors, was reevaluating their relationship with the gymnast. Late Sunday, sources close to the company confirmed the worst: the $22 million deal is done.
In a statement, New Balance said:
“We believe in promoting respect and fairness in all areas of sport. At this time, we’ve decided to move in a different direction with our athlete partnerships.”
Though they didn’t mention Biles by name, insiders have confirmed that her recent online comments played a direct role in the brand’s decision.
Fans Divided, Fallout Continues

Social media exploded with reactions. Supporters of Gaines hailed the decision as “a win for real women in sports,” while others accused New Balance of caving to pressure from anti-inclusion voices.
One comment that gained traction online read:
“Simone Biles was a role model to so many young girls — until she sided with ideology over biology.”
Others argued that Biles was simply standing up for her beliefs and should be praised for her courage.
Was It Worth It?

The real question now: Was it worth it? Losing $22 million over a social media exchange has sparked serious discussion about the price of activism in the age of corporate sponsorships.
Critics of Biles say her stance came off as dismissive of women’s concerns, especially coming from someone who rose to fame competing in a female-only category. Supporters argue she’s being unfairly punished for expressing empathy and inclusiveness.
Either way, the consequences are real — and they’re setting a precedent.
The Bigger Picture
This isn’t the first time a celebrity or athlete has lost a deal over a politically charged stance — and it won’t be the last. But what makes this case stand out is the cultural fault line it exposes: women’s sports, transgender inclusion, and corporate loyalty to public opinion.
Riley Gaines has not directly responded to Biles’ comments, but she posted a cryptic tweet after the announcement:
“Truth doesn’t need defending. It just needs people brave enough to stand for it.”
Final Thoughts
As the dust settles, Simone Biles’ future as a sponsored athlete is uncertain. Will other brands follow suit? Or will she double down and build a new image among progressive supporters? One thing is clear: the price of speaking out — on either side — is higher than ever.
News
EXCLUSIVE: I’ve Been Silent Long Enough — Colbert’s 8-Word Sentence Caught on Hot Mic Has CBS in Total Panic!C4
“I’ve Been Silent Long Enough” — Colbert’s 8-Word Sentence Caught on Hot Mic Has CBS in Total Panic The red…
Jamie Lee Curtis Accuses CBS of Silencing Her After Colbert’s EXIT — A Bold Allegation That Could Shake Late-Night TV”
In a stunning development that has rocked the entertainment industry, actress Jamie Lee Curtis has publicly accused CBS of silencing…
“HOW COULD YOU BE SO STUPID?” — Rachel Maddow EXPLODES on Karoline Leavitt in Blistering Live TV Takedown That Left the Studio Frozen It was supposed to be another routine political spar—until Karoline Leavitt made one false claim too many. In a moment now seared into MSNBC history, Rachel Maddow dropped her notes, stared her guest down, and delivered seven brutal words that ended the debate in an instant: “How could you be so stupid?” What followed wasn’t a shouting match—it was surgical. Maddow dismantled Leavitt’s claim piece by piece while producers struggled to keep the cameras rolling. The crowd went silent. Leavitt froze. And social media exploded. Now, even Maddow’s critics admit: that moment wasn’t just a correction—it was a reckoning.
A live MSNBC segment turned sharply confrontational this week when White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt made an unverified accusation…
“How Could You Be So Stupid?” — Rachel Maddow Shuts Down Karoline Leavitt After False On-Air Claim Sparks Instant Backlash
A live MSNBC segment turned sharply confrontational this week when White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt made an unverified accusation…
“I Don’t Care What You Think of Me” Robert De Niro Disarms Megyn Kelly with Eight Words That Redefined Silence on Live TelevisionThe moment didn’t explode.C4
The moment didn’t explode. It imploded — in real time, in total stillness, and on Megyn Kelly’s own stage. A…
“He Wants All Immigrants Out of America but He Can’t Even Keep Immigrants Out of His Wife.” — Newsom Destroys Miller With One Scandalous Line on Live TV
It wasn’t policy.It wasn’t personal—until it was. Gavin Newsom didn’t come to attack Stephen Miller’s marriage.But when the architect of…
End of content
No more pages to load






